Hmmm, that's weird, it works for me.
What version of GCC are you using?
What does:
echo yes | gcc -E -Wfoodeclaration-after-statement -
produce for you? For me I get only:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wfoodeclaration-after-statement"
# 1 "<stdin>"
(but no "yes").
Oh, OK, it looks like older versions of GCC (I just tried 3.2) don't
error out when presented an invalid command line argument.
Hmmm, at least it should still compile on those GCC versions, but now I
have to think of a different test...
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
The checks in configure.in
for this doesnt work properly for
GCC versions which do not support this -W directive.
Eventhough it is not supported by GCC
AC_MSG_CHECKING(to see if we can add '-Wdeclaration-after-statement'...
still adds it to the compile flags.
I will see if i can figure out why the test fails.
Me and automake/configure are not on friendly terms.
On 3/26/07, morriss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <morriss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=21195
User: morriss
Date: 2007/03/26 12:32 AM
Log:
If we're using gcc, try to use -Wdeclaration-after-statement to catch more
non-portable commits. I'm not sure if this is the Right Way to test to see
if the compiler can handle a specific option but it's simple and efficient
enough.
Directory: /trunk/
Changes Path Action
+8 -0 configure.in Modified
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
Wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
