ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 21134: /trunk/tools/lemon/ /trunk/to

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:46:33 -0700

On Mar 22, 2007, at 4:39 PM, lego@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=21134

User: lego
Date: 2007/03/22 11:39 PM

Log:
squelch a warning generated by generated code

The fix works, but for that particular style of signed vs. unsigned warning - comparing a signed value against a value computed from sizeof's - I slightly prefer to cast the signed value to an appropriate unsigned type after it's been shown to be nonnegative:

if( tokenType>0 && (size_t)tokenType<(sizeof(yyTokenName)/ sizeof(yyTokenName[0])) )

(and, in many - most? - of those cases, you have to check that the value is nonnegative *anyway*, so that check needs to be added), not that it makes a difference in the real world (there probably aren't going to be more than 2147483647 token types...).

(Of course, in that case, what I'd *really* prefer would be that compilers realized that, in the second comparison in that expression, the value of tokenType is always >= 0 (in fact, it's always > 0), so there's no need to issue a signed vs. unsigned warning in that case....)