Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20955: /trunk/docbook/wsug_src/ /trunk/docbook/wsug_src/: WSUG_chapter_capture.xml

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:32:12 +0100

sfisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20955

User: sfisher
Date: 2007/03/01 09:08 PM

Log:
 Fix bug #1409:
There is an error in the page:
 http://wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChCapCaptureFilterSection.html
According to Example 4.2, the filter 'tcp port 23 and not host 10.0.0.5'
 captures all telnet traffic not from 10.0.0.5. But this filter also discards
 traffic to 10.0.0.5. Either you use this filter to capture all telnet traffic
 not to and not from 10.0.0.5 or you use filter 'tcp port 23 and not src host
 10.0.0.5'.

Directory: /trunk/docbook/wsug_src/
  Changes    Path                        Action
  +1 -1      WSUG_chapter_capture.xml    Modified

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
Wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits
Hi!

My fault, that this example was wrong.


While technically correct, your fix don't seem to fit well with my intention of the text ;-)

It might be better to use the term "to/from" and use the old filter string. This way it keeps to explain the not operator - and only the not operator.

To explain more things like src/dst and alike, some new examples should be added at the XXX mark instead.

On the other hand, this section needs a review/rewrite anyway ...

Regards, ULFL


  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems in configuration
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] fuzz testing segfault found
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] fuzz testing segfault found
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Dissector hooks: Small and Simple additions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation