may be we should have EP_COPY_ADDRESS, SE_COPY_ADDRESS and
PE_COPY_ADDRESS instead.
On 11/13/06, Kukosa, Tomas <tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to
se_alloc() ?
It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage.
Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has?
Tomas
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
