Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] base64.x & crypt-md5.x; linking issues using them.

From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:36:42 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,

Add the symbols to epan/libwireshark.def.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Brian Vandenberg wrote:

>   In the interim I've opted for the expedient approach of just adding
> the relevant .c files to makefile.common for my plugin, and that seems
> to work fine.  I'm supposing there's a better way to do it, though, so
> I'm still open to suggestions.
>
> -Brian
>
> Brian Vandenberg wrote:
> >   My apologies in advance if this ends up being a duplicate.  I sent it
> > earlier before my request to be added to the list had been approved.
> >
> >  I'm writing a plugin (win32 dev environment) in which I need access to
> > functionality in base64.x and crypt-md5.x.  I had been under the
> > [faulty?] assumption that the object files for these two are compiled
> > into libwireshark.lib, which is already being linked into my plugin:
> >
> > ...
> > LINK_PLUGIN_WITH=..\..\epan\libwireshark.lib
> > ...
> > $(PLUGIN_NAME).dll $(PLUGIN_NAME).exp $(PLUGIN_NAME).lib : $(OBJECTS)
> > $(LINK_PLUGIN_WITH)
> >    link -dll /out $(PLUGIN_NAME).dll $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) \
> >       $(LINK_PLUGIN_WITH) $(GLIB_LIBS) $(PCRE_LIBS) zdll.lib
> > ...
> >
> >  However, I still get the following link errors:
> >
> > error: LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _md5_finish
> > error: LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _md5_append
> > error: LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _md5_init
> > error: LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _epan_base64_decode
> >
> >  My apologies in advance for the likely noobish question, I'm just not
> > sure what I need to link in, or what to alter.  I've not seen any
> > examples of plugins that use them, and since the non-plugin dissectors
> > are all linked either at compile or runtime when building wireshark
> > itself, I'm supposing that I won't glean anything useful by looking at
> > the wireshark/dissectors makefile (which hasn't stopped me from trying).
> >
> >  If anyone has some suggestions, they'll be welcome.
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>