https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7313
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Donnelly <stephen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-31 22:04:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm fine with patch (I didn't know that we link libwireshark with libwiretap).
ldd on libwireshark suggests that it is?
$ ldd /usr/local/lib/libwireshark.so.0
..
libwiretap.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwiretap.so.0 (0x00007fbb00d8c000)
..
> But wouldn't be better to build value_string array for all encaps, and use it
> in hf_frame_wtap_encap?
The 'hf_register_info' will only work with a static value_string array,
correct? I'm not sure how/if they can be used with dissector tables. When would
you build the value_string?
As noted I'm not sure this is the best way to do this, although it appears to
work.
It would be nice to be able to map the frame.interface_id to the
wtap.interface_data[i]->if_name or if_description string as well, but I can't
see how to get there from here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
