https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7205
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-27 09:08:06 PDT ---
Hi,
it appears that AECP_STATUS_FIELD_OFFSET (should it be named
AECP_STATUS_CODE_OFFSET?) has the same value that AECP_CD_LENGTH_OFFSET. Is
this normal?
If yes, I guess hf_aecp_status_code should have a mask (AECP_STATUS_CODE_MASK?)
in its definition so as to retrieve the right bits.
Please also report in your patch the "ieee1722.status" -> "ieee17221.status"
typo error I fixed in revision 42288.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
