https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5270
--- Comment #50 from Shoichi Sakane <wireshark-shoichi@xxxxxxxx> 2011-07-26 07:02:11 PDT ---
Thanks for your review.
I will fix the two of bottoms.
Do I have to revive a switch-case rather a function table ?
Shoichi
(In reply to comment #49)
> (In reply to comment #48)
> > - improved the option handler.
>
> I prefer when there is a switch with case (more readable)
>
> otherwise
> There is 2 errors with checkhf
> ERROR: NO ARRAY: epan/dissectors/packet-coap.c, hf_coap_opt_block2
> ERROR: NO ARRAY: epan/dissectors/packet-coap.c, hf_coap_opt_block1
>
>
> +static void
> +dissect_coap_opt_port(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *subtree,
> gint offset, gint opt_length, int hfindex)
> +{
> + proto_item *item = NULL;
> +
> + if (opt_length > 2) {
> + proto_tree_add_text(subtree, tvb, 0, 0, "Invalid length: %d",
> opt_length);
> + return;
> + }
>
> Why not use expert_info to display this error ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
