https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5655
--- Comment #11 from herorade-wireshark@xxxxxxxx 2011-02-07 02:57:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Hi Guy,
I had to make a lot of corrections in the CM-STATUS source file. To be honest,
I prefer to let these reviewed first.
But I plan to create further dissectors for DOCSIS 3.0 (Upstream Segment header
and QDB-Request) Then I'll have more expierence and more understanding. So I'm
willing to use "expert info" in future and add these to CM-STATUS later.
I hope that's ok
+Hendrik
> 6. Using "expert info" to flag invalid packets isn't a requirement, but it's a
> good idea; the "expert info" mechanism was introduced into Wireshark after the
> DOCSIS dissector was added, and nobody's added support for it to the older
> DOCSIS code, which is why it's not used elsewhere. (Adding it would be a good
> idea, too.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
