Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5548] New: Missing out of order detection

Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 04:29:27 -0800 (PST)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5548

           Summary: Missing out of order detection
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: 1.4.2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows 7
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Low
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: g.borello@xxxxxxxxx


Created an attachment (id=5702)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5702)
trace

Build Information:
Version 1.4.2 (SVN Rev 34959 from /trunk-1.4)

Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 2.16.6, with GLib 2.22.4, with WinPcap (version
unknown), with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, without libpcre, without
SMI, with c-ares 1.7.1, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS 2.8.5, with
Gcrypt 1.4.5, without Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Nov
19 2010), with AirPcap.

Running on 64-bit Windows 7, build 7600, with WinPcap version 4.1.2 (packet.dll
version 4.1.0.2001), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008),
GnuTLS 2.8.5, Gcrypt 1.4.5, without AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 9.0 build 30729

--
Hi,
Why packet 10 in the attached capture is not marked as an "out of order"
packet? Is it because it doesn't carry any data?
Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.