https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2254
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-09 13:17:28 MST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > ouch!
>
> Hi Steve. Any chance you might be able to finish your patch to fix this bug?
> I looked at the patch, and just a few comments:
I'll give it another try.
> 1) Why make the "summary_in_tree" preference obsolete? Why not just make it
> apply to all of them or none of them?
I don't remember ;)
> 2) I think the tags could use some work. For example, for Q-in-Q tagging,
> there could be an outer tag that differs from the inner tag (e.g., 9100, 9200
> or 9300 outer tag and 8100 inner tag). And once 802.1ad is integrated, then
> the 88a8 tag could also be present.
Ok. I don't know anything about 802.1ad yet...
> Only 2 years later, are you feeling the love? :)
I remember these old bugs like I just worked on them yesterday. Remembering
why I was doing certain things on them is another story apparently :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
