Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] New: "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:33:36 +0000 (GMT)

http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1976

           Summary: "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c
                    from LDAP
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: SVN
          Platform: Macintosh
        OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.5
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Low
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Build Information:
wireshark 0.99.7 (SVN Rev 23369)

Copyright 1998-2007 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.12.1, with GLib 2.14.2, with libpcap 0.9.5, with libz
1.2.3, without libpcre, without SMI, without ADNS, without Lua, without GnuTLS,
without Gcrypt, with MIT Kerberos, without PortAudio, without AirPcap.
NOTE: this build doesn't support the "matches" operator for Wireshark filter
syntax.

Running on Darwin 9.0.0, with libpcap version 0.9.5.

Built using gcc 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465).


--
 Doing a capture gave a bunch of

    Warn Dissector bug, protocol LDAP, in packet {N}: packet-ber.c:1193: failed
assertion "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED"

warnings.

That's from dissect_ber_integer64(), which is warning that the item's length is
between 1 and 8, and that the type of the field is not any of the FT_INTn or
FT_UINTn types.

I don't have the capture (it was a live capture, and I didn't notice the errors
until after I'd quit Wireshark), but I'll look at the LDAP dissector at some
point to see if there are any obvious errors of that sort.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP
      • From: bugzilla-daemon
    • [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP
      • From: bugzilla-daemon
    • [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP
      • From: bugzilla-daemon
    • [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP
      • From: bugzilla-daemon
  • Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1975] CFM dissector bugfixes and code update for ITU inclusion
  • Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1956] Wireshark crashes on certain display filters (ftype ipv4)
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1975] CFM dissector bugfixes and code update for ITU inclusion
  • Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1976] "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED" failures in packet-ber.c from LDAP
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation