Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1053] New SNMP filtering is broken

From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 07:21:58 +0000 (GMT)

http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1053





------- Comment #5 from tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-11-01 07:21 GMT -------
I have it tested and exact match for FT_OID works well.
What should be the goal? Should it be to find all objects "begin" with some
OID?

The FT_OID implements only exact match. If it is necessary to use e.g.
"contains" operator, the FT_STRING can be used. OIDs in BER/PER can be handled
in both FT_STRING and FT_OID ways. It depends only on dissector developer what
he decide to use.
Maybe, we should implement more operators for FT_OID but I do not have
experince with it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.